meta: Give Sexy Actors Sexy Wheelchairs!
Oct. 10th, 2012 11:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Attention: Mild spoilers for: X-Men: First Class, Supernatural season 5/6, Dark Angel, Heroes, Glee, Star Trek. Contains Opinions. Fairly image-heavy. Thanks to
nix_this for the beta.
Give Sexy Actors Sexy Wheelchairs!
There's something beautiful about the simple physics of wheels in motion. And there's something immensely satisfying about racing downhill on a trustworthy set of them. But I digress. This is about wheels, (mostly) white (mostly) male characters, and how The Powers That Be on TV and film sets seem fated--whether by unpleasant design or mere privileged ignorance--to be forever Getting It Wrong. When they could be getting it oh, so right. Anyway,
kink_bingo 2012, 'mechanical/technological', here we go...
This is Captain (later Admiral) Christopher Pike.


(He used to look a little different back in the 1960s, but I'm not going there. Too angry-making.)
This is Bobby Singer.

Chris and Bobby have a few things in common. Views that don’t align perfectly with the mainstream. Jobs that require such physically demanding skills as running from monsters over rough terrain. A certain ability with guns. An interest in saving the world. A bunch of very capable, but not necessarily wise, young 'uns to keep an eye on.
And poorly thought-out, poorly-explained disabling injuries. (Pike has an accident involving a bug. Bobby has an accident involving a demon and a knife. I have yet to work out how either of these could produce results so precisely resembling those expected from a fairly low spinal cord injury, and the relevant scripts do not explain.)
Oh, and one more thing.
Extremely poor choice of on-screen mobility device. I don’t know who to blame for this—writers? Directors? Props people?—but I know it smacks of undone research. That and, perhaps, a narrative (or even kinky) interest in maintaining the unfounded orthodox view that people with disabilities are automatically dependent on others for the basic activities of daily life.
See also:
Charles Xavier, X-Men: First Class (has an accident involving a bullet)

(He used to look different, too, and often still does. Not going there, too complicated.)
Heidi Petrelli, Heroes (has an accident involving a car)

Artie Abrams, Glee (had a pre-series accident involving a car)

Logan Cale (“Eyes Only”), Dark Angel (has an accident involving a bullet)

(FWIW, the only wheelchair-using character of colour I could think of in a major TV/film role was a distant memory of "that guy in Viper", representing the near-standard trope of the crippled genius scientist/tech support guy. Wikipedia informs me that this was Dr. Julian Wilkes, played by Dorian Harewood.)
So. Wheelchairs, huh? Props or costumes? Well, if they're props, shouldn't they be portable? And if they're costumes, shouldn't they, uh, fit?


Note the size and position of the large wheels on both Xavier’s and Pike’s wheelchairs. (Xavier's wheelchair doesn't look as if it's even designed to move--what are those things at the back?--but it has push handles, and the actress clearly thinks she's meant to be pushing it, so I read it as intended to be a functional manual wheelchair.) These wheels would be exceedingly difficult for the users to reach and push effectively (IF the powers that be in film land permitted them to push their own chairs; note that both characters are provided with able-bodied pushers). For reference, the guideline is that a person with arms of average length should be able to touch the hubs (centres) of the main (ordinarily rear) wheels while seated in the wheelchair without bending. Could these actors achieve this? I doubt it.
Secondly, note the armrests. Armrests on proper manual wheelchairs—I’m not talking about one-size-fits-all hospital cheapie chairs here, but about manual wheelchairs designed for active wheelchair users—are there for people who require arm support. Otherwise they just get in the way. Also, they’re removable--except, apparently, on these Hollywood monstrosities--so if you DID have them but didn’t always need them, you wouldn’t keep them on the chair all the time. Neither of these men displays a sufficiently reduced level of arm function that I would expect them to require or want armrests (since we actually see this Charles get shot, and it's a low back injury, I wouldn't expect him to have any loss of arm function at all; he's not a quad, he's a para). These wheelchairs are physically a poor fit for these actors/characters.
Bobby has a different problem:


Namely, his is a one-size-fits-all hospital cheapie chair. I can't imagine what kind of decent physical rehabilitation centre would have sent him home in that monstrosity; I can only conclude that he didn't do rehab, because he's an ornery old sod, and just bought/obtained the cheapest thing he could and went on his way. In which case he let his feelings get the better of him; a little research should have shown him that he could get a lot more done with a better wheelchair (and the training to use it well), and since he must have been shelling out for housing modifications at the time (ramps, bathroom mods, etc), you'd think he might not have balked at actually paying for a better quality version of the thing he was going to be relying on for 100% of his daily mobility for the foreseeable future. (Failing this, I'd have expected him to hole up in his workshop and see if he couldn't manufacture or modify a wheelchair that was actually suitable for his line of work. Iron might be heavy, but it's gotta be kinda useful to be sitting in a machine made of stuff ghosts can't abide! And think of the possibilities for toting weapons, holy water, and so on! I just can't see Bobby sitting around in a standard hospital monstrosity for very long, no matter how mopey he was feeling.)
Heidi Petrelli’s wheelchair is not congruent with her level of function, given that her family’s wealth makes price no object. My google-fu failed me on finding screen caps, but
nix_this has come through.

(What do you see here? I see a small girl in a huge contraption. It'd be difficult to find a wheelchair that more loudly screamed hey, wheelchair here! Look at the wheelchair! Pay no attention to the person sitting in it!)

(Note what the presence of the unnecessary armrests makes her do to reach the rims. In addition, this wheelchair is at least a couple of inches too wide for her. Counting wheelspacing as well as seat width, I'd say >5 inches. Would you buy glasses that were 5 inches too wide for your face?)
Trust me: the chair she has is not the chair she would have, if she'd been through a competent rehab programme or even simply had the chair scripted by a competent OT, and nor would she push it like that. I don’t think it’s possible for someone who actually is an active wheelchair user to watch Heroes and believe that that character had been through any kind of competent rehab process. But it's still not as bad as Xavier's and Pike's, because the actress can push that wheelchair, it's just... clumsy and awkward and slow and she'd probably die if she went anywhere near a steep hill.


(Disclaimer: I've seen precisely one episode of Glee in its entirety, "Wheels", and I judge on that. At some stage, I gave the show a second chance only to switch it off when the recap offended me with some stupid shit about Artie having borrowed crutches and attempted to stand up so he could tap-dance. What? I mean what the actual fuck? Just what drugs are these writers on?)
Artie Abrams is better supplied. He has a decent wheelchair, although it doesn't fit him terribly well. I haven't managed find a cap that properly shows his (rather telling) typical off-to-the-side leg position, although the one towards the top of the page gives a hint, but even these images show that his footplate is too high--it's actually built up on risers, which you don't usually see on the wheelchairs of average-sized adults. Uh, ditto with the female character there. Your legs are actually supposed to touch the seat cushion, you know, not be lifted up off it because your feet are sitting too high. Also, the actor appears to have made zero effort to learn to push it. (Either that or he thinks it’s appropriate to invent a kind of Steve Urkel Nerd Walk for wheelchair users. Artie alone is reason enough for me not to watch Glee.)
On the plus side, it does appear to be a decent modern lightweight chair, a Colours, maybe, from the castor forks. So some Kudos there. But it should be set up very differently, with no anti-tips (please! A teenager with full upper-body function and no balance issues who's been using a wheelchair for years rocking around with anti-tips on all the time? No way. His anti-tips would be gathering dust in the bottom of a cupboard somewhere, and he'd have a tippy chair to boot. So he could, you know, get over obstacles larger than the anti-tips will allow. Plus have a smaller wheelbase, be able to back up closer to things, and other fun stuff. Again, telling that when they brought in the actual wheelchair user to do Artie's stunts in "Wheels", that was a differently-set-up chair with no anti-tips. Indeed, the one vaguely impressive stunt the stunt guy does cannot be done with anti-tips on, period.)

(Disclaimer: I'm only part way through watching the first season of Dark Angel; they still have plenty of time to screw it up!)
Logan Cale does much better, IMHO. Not only does he have a recognisably high-end wheelchair—which makes in-universe sense, given his wealth—and not only is it a good fit, but the actor has clearly made an effort to learn to use it. The cinematography doesn’t make a big deal of his wheelchair use (refreshing!), but from what we do see, he looks to me like he’s reasonably fluent. (It would be nice if the writers/directors had gone to as much trouble as the actor and props people clearly have here. Then perhaps we wouldn’t have frankly bizarre scenes like the one where thugs kidnap Logan, carrying him into their car and leaving his wheelchair behind. Um, they fit into cars, you know. And won't he be easier to move around when you get to Evil HQ, thus requiring less thugly attention, in his wheelchair?)
I find the Logan Cale case particularly impressive given that, IMHO, the cure storyline was always a given. I suspect the inevitability of the Heidi Petrelli cure was a contributing factor to the lack of effort at authenticity there, but the Dark Angel people, with the same ‘excuse’, have gone to rather more trouble.
I’m not going to touch on my discomfort with ‘cure’ story lines, the refusal of the powers that be to consider casting actual actors with disabilities for these parts, or the frankly offensive attitude of Kevin McHale and the Glee institution. Others have tackled these much better elsewhere, and I’d like to be a bit more positive here.
Great wheelchairs fit. They’re light enough for the particular, individual user to manage, without being too light. They support, they enable. (They don’t, unless you have a spare grand or so, have anything that can accurately be termed ‘brakes’.) They have only those extra/bolt-on parts--for example push handles, seat belts, arm rests, side guards, anti-tip tubes--that the particular user actually needs. And these parts cost extra, so you don't generally order them on a whim.)

This is a good wheelchair, for its user (me). It’s a Quickie Ti Titanium, about five years old, a discontinued model. (Many manufacturers are discontinuing their titanium lines. They say it’s because aluminium is better and cheaper, but that’s not universally reflected in either user consensus or, you know, prices.) It’s no longer a great fit and no longer entirely suits my needs (I have a new one on the way, aluminium, over an inch narrower, with larger lighter wheels. Red ones!). It obviously doesn’t suit the needs of 12” Captain Pike here. But it’s still a great chair, and it’s beautiful. (It’s my Impala.)

(The seat is clearly too wide. He cannot reach the wheels.)

(It's comfortable, though. He could totally nap on this cushion. It's a Roho, you know.)

(Lots of dump on this chair--that's the difference between the back and front floor-to-seat-heights. Note how minimal the frame looks, so that you tend to see lots of person and relatively little chair. Also note how BIG the big wheels are, how they stick up higher than the seat, and how far forward they're positioned. With the wheels here, and the user's weight falling where it does, this is a very tippy wheelchair, to the point of being unsafe for the uninitiated. I'm not saying this is optimum for everyone. But some of the wheelchairs shown elsewhere on this page are optimum for no one.)
Not everyone feels the same way I do about the awesomeness of good wheelchairs, of course. There’s a common attitude that wheelchairs are the most boring part of someone’s life, and that caring about the technical details or the latest developments is somehow dwelling on an unpleasant part of life. It’s an attitude that seems most common with people with recent disabling injuries and with people who’ve used wheelchairs basically all their lives, know what works for them, and have no further enthusiasm for the topic. But I love my wheelchair, and you can bet Aaron Fotheringham’s pretty proud of the wheelchair (a Colours Boing) that helps him turn backflips. (Unless Kevin McHale/Artie has had more than one stunt double in Glee, it's Aaron I referenced above.)
For your amusement (or cold-sweating horror), I present Aaron's most famous moment:
And some other attempts, not all as successful:
Aaron is exceptional. I don't recommend any of us try his tricks at home. But the almost symbiotic relationship between him and his wheelchair is there for all to see, as is the attitude that says, hey, let's see what this thing can do. That's what I expect to see in characters like Artie Abrams. It would be far more realistic than what we get. And I don't think it's too much to ask.
And, hey, don't Aaron and that chair look really good together? There's just something great about seeing someone work so beautifully in concert with a tool, whether that tool is a wheelchair, a BMX bike, a vaulting horse, or a baby grand piano.
There is an actual real-world kink, devoteeism. Devotees may genuinely find someone more attractive the more disabled they are or look, and therefore there’s an argument to be made that giving characters useless, crappy, ugly wheelchairs heightens their appeal to a certain niche of the audience. But if you’re a movie mogul or TV studio suit who says as much to me, I will punch you. It won’t be a very powerful punch, but it’ll be from wheelchair height so you might find it lands somewhere painful. If that’s what the deal is, it shouldn’t be what the deal is. The existence of devoteeism doesn't hurt me; these ongoing unrealistic, negative, and harmful portrayals of people with disabilities do.
But I don’t think that explains it. I think it’s a lack of research, a lack of awareness of what disability is like in the real world, and a profound lack of Giving a Damn about those people. (Even though those people are, if we include all long-term disabilities, estimated to be something like TWENTY PERCENT of the population, and therefore of your audience.) And I think in the case of things like Star Trek there’s another issue: the designers are trying to be futuristic. (I suspect this is what lets down X-Men: First Class as well, though I can’t think why they’d be trying to come up with an OMG FUTURISTIC!! wheelchair for a film set in the 1960s.)
I don’t expect film designers to have the time, enthusiasm, or general wherewithal to gain a good working knowledge of how wheelchair design has changed over time and why, though the general trends (towards more minimal, less obvious frames, lighter weight without compromising strength, and greater customisability to suit individual needs) should be obvious. This is what I’d ask them to do, and it’s simple:
Find the best example you can of what works today. This may mean taking your actor to an appropriately qualified occupational therapist and saying “price isn’t an issue. Please fit this actor for the best, most appropriate manual wheelchair for his size and for the disability he is playing, which is X”. When your actor has been thus supplied with a suitable wheelchair, let him play around with it for a few days, then have him show you what he can do with it, and note how he does these things, how he uses his arms, etc. (That step can be skipped if you’re pressed for time.) Then take the wheelchair back to your lair, and ‘futurize’ it. Think about the changes you can suggest have been made to materials in the years intervening between now and your movie’s setting. You may want, for instance, to replace metal tubing with clear material, to paint plastic parts silver as if they were metal, to replace plain upholstery with more futuristic-looking fabrics, or to query the CGI people about whether they can matte out parts (the way the spokes on Kirk’s motorbike wheels were removed in post). Come up with a more futuristic LOOKING version of a modern day chair that suits the actor, in short. Don’t fuck with its function, because that’s just stupid. Stupid and offensive. Stupid and offensive and inexcusable. Okay, so not just stupid. Don't radically redesign a machine you know precious little about. Don't be so arrogant as to think you can reinvent the wheel[chair] during six weeks of pre-production.
A note on power: DO NOT think you are making a manual wheelchair more futuristic and space-age and awesome by making it a powerchair. Even if it hovers, climbs staircases, and bakes soufflés. Manual wheelchairs look and function the way they do FOR A REASON. Think about it: if powerchairs were innately superior for all people in all circumstances, why would you ever see manual wheelchairs around the place? You wouldn’t. Check the prices: high-end manuals can be more expensive than low-end powered models. Absolutely, power has some advantages over manual, for example:
Places where manual wins hands-down include:
Could go on, but I won’t. Suffice it to say that there are plenty of good reasons to make either choice, and suggesting that in the future every wheelchair user will use power because OMG IT’S OBVIOUSLY BETTER misses the point. And seems somehow to insult those of us who’ve chosen not to embrace power here, now, in the present.
Try doing this in a powerchair:
Now, I can’t do this. Frankly, I don’t think I’d have the guts even to try. All alone, and faced with a staircase like this and a strong need or desire to climb it, I would probably get out of the wheelchair, then crawl or bump up the stairs one by one, pulling my wheelchair behind me, and get back in at the top (difficult, but do-able). There is no way I could do the same thing with a powerchair, it’s just too heavy and is not designed to be lugged around like that. Would I trust a stair climbing powerchair? Not very damn likely. And even if I had one, I wouldn’t use it. I like getting around under my own power, and actually making some use of what muscle power I have left. Power isn’t for me. It’s not for a lot of people, at least not full-time. Some folks have both kinds of wheelchair and use what’s most appropriate for where they have to be on a given day or how they’re feeling.
I’m including some examples below of good-looking, well-performing, lightweight and ultra-lightweight modern manual wheelchairs (mostly marketing pics). I’m personally picturing Admiral Pike in the TiLite, though possibly with flashier back wheels (they're easily interchanged, with the caveat that US and European axle diameters may differ). :-)

(Quickie Q7, aka Quickie Helium. Aluminium, with thicker tubing than would be necessary with more expensive metals. Consequently has a somewhat blunt, rough, 'butch' look to my eye. Lots of folks hate the caster position on these, since they're in-line with the main wheels rather than tucked in a little so they tend to get in the way more.)

(Lasher Sport BT-MG. These guys do some pretty amazing custom work. Check out their dragon chair!)

(Panthera X. Very modern, very very light, lots of carbon fibre, very wow.)

(TiLite ZRA, adjustable, titanium, beautiful. The Aero-Z is the aluminium version, which I was able to trial recently. Sweet chair from a legitimately well-regarded company.)

(Colours Razorblade. This is what I'm getting, though in a profoundly different configuration. If I hadn't been roped into trying one a couple of years ago at a show I would never have considered this model, because the way the chair looks in the stock photos isn't attractive to me, and nor is the company's insistence on 'bling' and on using sexy women--no sexy men in sight--to advertise its chairs. But the proof's in the trial. When I came to do official trials to identify the best new chair for me, no other chair made me grin. It feels right. And I've opted to go without the bling ;-)

(Progeo Joker Evolution. Saw this at a trade show, up there on a pedestal like the minor god it is, and snapped a picture because I knew I didn't dare ask the price! I call it 'The Thing of Beauty'. I love its green trim, particulary the green wheel rims--NOT push rims, they've actually coloured the metal of the wheel! Spectacular.)
I thought I’d finish up with a nice, handy, memorable slogan that perhaps Hollywood types can actually grok: GIVE SEXY ACTORS SEXY WHEELCHAIRS!
Because wheelchairs are not the enemy. Wheelchairs are wonderful. Wheelchairs are how you get out and do awesome things in the world when your feet can’t be trusted to carry you. And getting around by wheelchair can be fun in ways that getting around on foot can't; trust me, I've been there, done both.
A wheelchair can fit like a glove. It can feel like part of you. It can express your personality. It can be beautiful. It can be sexy.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
There's something beautiful about the simple physics of wheels in motion. And there's something immensely satisfying about racing downhill on a trustworthy set of them. But I digress. This is about wheels, (mostly) white (mostly) male characters, and how The Powers That Be on TV and film sets seem fated--whether by unpleasant design or mere privileged ignorance--to be forever Getting It Wrong. When they could be getting it oh, so right. Anyway,
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
This is Captain (later Admiral) Christopher Pike.


(He used to look a little different back in the 1960s, but I'm not going there. Too angry-making.)
This is Bobby Singer.

Chris and Bobby have a few things in common. Views that don’t align perfectly with the mainstream. Jobs that require such physically demanding skills as running from monsters over rough terrain. A certain ability with guns. An interest in saving the world. A bunch of very capable, but not necessarily wise, young 'uns to keep an eye on.
And poorly thought-out, poorly-explained disabling injuries. (Pike has an accident involving a bug. Bobby has an accident involving a demon and a knife. I have yet to work out how either of these could produce results so precisely resembling those expected from a fairly low spinal cord injury, and the relevant scripts do not explain.)
Oh, and one more thing.
Extremely poor choice of on-screen mobility device. I don’t know who to blame for this—writers? Directors? Props people?—but I know it smacks of undone research. That and, perhaps, a narrative (or even kinky) interest in maintaining the unfounded orthodox view that people with disabilities are automatically dependent on others for the basic activities of daily life.
See also:
Charles Xavier, X-Men: First Class (has an accident involving a bullet)

(He used to look different, too, and often still does. Not going there, too complicated.)
Heidi Petrelli, Heroes (has an accident involving a car)

Artie Abrams, Glee (had a pre-series accident involving a car)

Logan Cale (“Eyes Only”), Dark Angel (has an accident involving a bullet)

(FWIW, the only wheelchair-using character of colour I could think of in a major TV/film role was a distant memory of "that guy in Viper", representing the near-standard trope of the crippled genius scientist/tech support guy. Wikipedia informs me that this was Dr. Julian Wilkes, played by Dorian Harewood.)
So. Wheelchairs, huh? Props or costumes? Well, if they're props, shouldn't they be portable? And if they're costumes, shouldn't they, uh, fit?


Note the size and position of the large wheels on both Xavier’s and Pike’s wheelchairs. (Xavier's wheelchair doesn't look as if it's even designed to move--what are those things at the back?--but it has push handles, and the actress clearly thinks she's meant to be pushing it, so I read it as intended to be a functional manual wheelchair.) These wheels would be exceedingly difficult for the users to reach and push effectively (IF the powers that be in film land permitted them to push their own chairs; note that both characters are provided with able-bodied pushers). For reference, the guideline is that a person with arms of average length should be able to touch the hubs (centres) of the main (ordinarily rear) wheels while seated in the wheelchair without bending. Could these actors achieve this? I doubt it.
Secondly, note the armrests. Armrests on proper manual wheelchairs—I’m not talking about one-size-fits-all hospital cheapie chairs here, but about manual wheelchairs designed for active wheelchair users—are there for people who require arm support. Otherwise they just get in the way. Also, they’re removable--except, apparently, on these Hollywood monstrosities--so if you DID have them but didn’t always need them, you wouldn’t keep them on the chair all the time. Neither of these men displays a sufficiently reduced level of arm function that I would expect them to require or want armrests (since we actually see this Charles get shot, and it's a low back injury, I wouldn't expect him to have any loss of arm function at all; he's not a quad, he's a para). These wheelchairs are physically a poor fit for these actors/characters.
Bobby has a different problem:


Namely, his is a one-size-fits-all hospital cheapie chair. I can't imagine what kind of decent physical rehabilitation centre would have sent him home in that monstrosity; I can only conclude that he didn't do rehab, because he's an ornery old sod, and just bought/obtained the cheapest thing he could and went on his way. In which case he let his feelings get the better of him; a little research should have shown him that he could get a lot more done with a better wheelchair (and the training to use it well), and since he must have been shelling out for housing modifications at the time (ramps, bathroom mods, etc), you'd think he might not have balked at actually paying for a better quality version of the thing he was going to be relying on for 100% of his daily mobility for the foreseeable future. (Failing this, I'd have expected him to hole up in his workshop and see if he couldn't manufacture or modify a wheelchair that was actually suitable for his line of work. Iron might be heavy, but it's gotta be kinda useful to be sitting in a machine made of stuff ghosts can't abide! And think of the possibilities for toting weapons, holy water, and so on! I just can't see Bobby sitting around in a standard hospital monstrosity for very long, no matter how mopey he was feeling.)
Heidi Petrelli’s wheelchair is not congruent with her level of function, given that her family’s wealth makes price no object. My google-fu failed me on finding screen caps, but
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)

(What do you see here? I see a small girl in a huge contraption. It'd be difficult to find a wheelchair that more loudly screamed hey, wheelchair here! Look at the wheelchair! Pay no attention to the person sitting in it!)

(Note what the presence of the unnecessary armrests makes her do to reach the rims. In addition, this wheelchair is at least a couple of inches too wide for her. Counting wheelspacing as well as seat width, I'd say >5 inches. Would you buy glasses that were 5 inches too wide for your face?)
Trust me: the chair she has is not the chair she would have, if she'd been through a competent rehab programme or even simply had the chair scripted by a competent OT, and nor would she push it like that. I don’t think it’s possible for someone who actually is an active wheelchair user to watch Heroes and believe that that character had been through any kind of competent rehab process. But it's still not as bad as Xavier's and Pike's, because the actress can push that wheelchair, it's just... clumsy and awkward and slow and she'd probably die if she went anywhere near a steep hill.


(Disclaimer: I've seen precisely one episode of Glee in its entirety, "Wheels", and I judge on that. At some stage, I gave the show a second chance only to switch it off when the recap offended me with some stupid shit about Artie having borrowed crutches and attempted to stand up so he could tap-dance. What? I mean what the actual fuck? Just what drugs are these writers on?)
Artie Abrams is better supplied. He has a decent wheelchair, although it doesn't fit him terribly well. I haven't managed find a cap that properly shows his (rather telling) typical off-to-the-side leg position, although the one towards the top of the page gives a hint, but even these images show that his footplate is too high--it's actually built up on risers, which you don't usually see on the wheelchairs of average-sized adults. Uh, ditto with the female character there. Your legs are actually supposed to touch the seat cushion, you know, not be lifted up off it because your feet are sitting too high. Also, the actor appears to have made zero effort to learn to push it. (Either that or he thinks it’s appropriate to invent a kind of Steve Urkel Nerd Walk for wheelchair users. Artie alone is reason enough for me not to watch Glee.)
On the plus side, it does appear to be a decent modern lightweight chair, a Colours, maybe, from the castor forks. So some Kudos there. But it should be set up very differently, with no anti-tips (please! A teenager with full upper-body function and no balance issues who's been using a wheelchair for years rocking around with anti-tips on all the time? No way. His anti-tips would be gathering dust in the bottom of a cupboard somewhere, and he'd have a tippy chair to boot. So he could, you know, get over obstacles larger than the anti-tips will allow. Plus have a smaller wheelbase, be able to back up closer to things, and other fun stuff. Again, telling that when they brought in the actual wheelchair user to do Artie's stunts in "Wheels", that was a differently-set-up chair with no anti-tips. Indeed, the one vaguely impressive stunt the stunt guy does cannot be done with anti-tips on, period.)

(Disclaimer: I'm only part way through watching the first season of Dark Angel; they still have plenty of time to screw it up!)
Logan Cale does much better, IMHO. Not only does he have a recognisably high-end wheelchair—which makes in-universe sense, given his wealth—and not only is it a good fit, but the actor has clearly made an effort to learn to use it. The cinematography doesn’t make a big deal of his wheelchair use (refreshing!), but from what we do see, he looks to me like he’s reasonably fluent. (It would be nice if the writers/directors had gone to as much trouble as the actor and props people clearly have here. Then perhaps we wouldn’t have frankly bizarre scenes like the one where thugs kidnap Logan, carrying him into their car and leaving his wheelchair behind. Um, they fit into cars, you know. And won't he be easier to move around when you get to Evil HQ, thus requiring less thugly attention, in his wheelchair?)
I find the Logan Cale case particularly impressive given that, IMHO, the cure storyline was always a given. I suspect the inevitability of the Heidi Petrelli cure was a contributing factor to the lack of effort at authenticity there, but the Dark Angel people, with the same ‘excuse’, have gone to rather more trouble.
I’m not going to touch on my discomfort with ‘cure’ story lines, the refusal of the powers that be to consider casting actual actors with disabilities for these parts, or the frankly offensive attitude of Kevin McHale and the Glee institution. Others have tackled these much better elsewhere, and I’d like to be a bit more positive here.
Great wheelchairs fit. They’re light enough for the particular, individual user to manage, without being too light. They support, they enable. (They don’t, unless you have a spare grand or so, have anything that can accurately be termed ‘brakes’.) They have only those extra/bolt-on parts--for example push handles, seat belts, arm rests, side guards, anti-tip tubes--that the particular user actually needs. And these parts cost extra, so you don't generally order them on a whim.)

This is a good wheelchair, for its user (me). It’s a Quickie Ti Titanium, about five years old, a discontinued model. (Many manufacturers are discontinuing their titanium lines. They say it’s because aluminium is better and cheaper, but that’s not universally reflected in either user consensus or, you know, prices.) It’s no longer a great fit and no longer entirely suits my needs (I have a new one on the way, aluminium, over an inch narrower, with larger lighter wheels. Red ones!). It obviously doesn’t suit the needs of 12” Captain Pike here. But it’s still a great chair, and it’s beautiful. (It’s my Impala.)

(The seat is clearly too wide. He cannot reach the wheels.)

(It's comfortable, though. He could totally nap on this cushion. It's a Roho, you know.)

(Lots of dump on this chair--that's the difference between the back and front floor-to-seat-heights. Note how minimal the frame looks, so that you tend to see lots of person and relatively little chair. Also note how BIG the big wheels are, how they stick up higher than the seat, and how far forward they're positioned. With the wheels here, and the user's weight falling where it does, this is a very tippy wheelchair, to the point of being unsafe for the uninitiated. I'm not saying this is optimum for everyone. But some of the wheelchairs shown elsewhere on this page are optimum for no one.)
Not everyone feels the same way I do about the awesomeness of good wheelchairs, of course. There’s a common attitude that wheelchairs are the most boring part of someone’s life, and that caring about the technical details or the latest developments is somehow dwelling on an unpleasant part of life. It’s an attitude that seems most common with people with recent disabling injuries and with people who’ve used wheelchairs basically all their lives, know what works for them, and have no further enthusiasm for the topic. But I love my wheelchair, and you can bet Aaron Fotheringham’s pretty proud of the wheelchair (a Colours Boing) that helps him turn backflips. (Unless Kevin McHale/Artie has had more than one stunt double in Glee, it's Aaron I referenced above.)
For your amusement (or cold-sweating horror), I present Aaron's most famous moment:
And some other attempts, not all as successful:
Aaron is exceptional. I don't recommend any of us try his tricks at home. But the almost symbiotic relationship between him and his wheelchair is there for all to see, as is the attitude that says, hey, let's see what this thing can do. That's what I expect to see in characters like Artie Abrams. It would be far more realistic than what we get. And I don't think it's too much to ask.
And, hey, don't Aaron and that chair look really good together? There's just something great about seeing someone work so beautifully in concert with a tool, whether that tool is a wheelchair, a BMX bike, a vaulting horse, or a baby grand piano.
There is an actual real-world kink, devoteeism. Devotees may genuinely find someone more attractive the more disabled they are or look, and therefore there’s an argument to be made that giving characters useless, crappy, ugly wheelchairs heightens their appeal to a certain niche of the audience. But if you’re a movie mogul or TV studio suit who says as much to me, I will punch you. It won’t be a very powerful punch, but it’ll be from wheelchair height so you might find it lands somewhere painful. If that’s what the deal is, it shouldn’t be what the deal is. The existence of devoteeism doesn't hurt me; these ongoing unrealistic, negative, and harmful portrayals of people with disabilities do.
But I don’t think that explains it. I think it’s a lack of research, a lack of awareness of what disability is like in the real world, and a profound lack of Giving a Damn about those people. (Even though those people are, if we include all long-term disabilities, estimated to be something like TWENTY PERCENT of the population, and therefore of your audience.) And I think in the case of things like Star Trek there’s another issue: the designers are trying to be futuristic. (I suspect this is what lets down X-Men: First Class as well, though I can’t think why they’d be trying to come up with an OMG FUTURISTIC!! wheelchair for a film set in the 1960s.)
I don’t expect film designers to have the time, enthusiasm, or general wherewithal to gain a good working knowledge of how wheelchair design has changed over time and why, though the general trends (towards more minimal, less obvious frames, lighter weight without compromising strength, and greater customisability to suit individual needs) should be obvious. This is what I’d ask them to do, and it’s simple:
Find the best example you can of what works today. This may mean taking your actor to an appropriately qualified occupational therapist and saying “price isn’t an issue. Please fit this actor for the best, most appropriate manual wheelchair for his size and for the disability he is playing, which is X”. When your actor has been thus supplied with a suitable wheelchair, let him play around with it for a few days, then have him show you what he can do with it, and note how he does these things, how he uses his arms, etc. (That step can be skipped if you’re pressed for time.) Then take the wheelchair back to your lair, and ‘futurize’ it. Think about the changes you can suggest have been made to materials in the years intervening between now and your movie’s setting. You may want, for instance, to replace metal tubing with clear material, to paint plastic parts silver as if they were metal, to replace plain upholstery with more futuristic-looking fabrics, or to query the CGI people about whether they can matte out parts (the way the spokes on Kirk’s motorbike wheels were removed in post). Come up with a more futuristic LOOKING version of a modern day chair that suits the actor, in short. Don’t fuck with its function, because that’s just stupid. Stupid and offensive. Stupid and offensive and inexcusable. Okay, so not just stupid. Don't radically redesign a machine you know precious little about. Don't be so arrogant as to think you can reinvent the wheel[chair] during six weeks of pre-production.
A note on power: DO NOT think you are making a manual wheelchair more futuristic and space-age and awesome by making it a powerchair. Even if it hovers, climbs staircases, and bakes soufflés. Manual wheelchairs look and function the way they do FOR A REASON. Think about it: if powerchairs were innately superior for all people in all circumstances, why would you ever see manual wheelchairs around the place? You wouldn’t. Check the prices: high-end manuals can be more expensive than low-end powered models. Absolutely, power has some advantages over manual, for example:
- in a power chair, you can hold a drink or hold your darling’s hand while manoeuvring
- you can go further and faster on less muscle power
- you can moderate your downhill speed without risking the skin on your palms
- people who lack the function to push a manual chair far or at all can go places in a powerchair
- user-controlled tilt-and-recline functions for pressure relief are an expensive, but valuable, possibility with power
Places where manual wins hands-down include:
- there are no batteries to run out
- the wheelchair can be easily stowed in virtually any car (pop off main wheels, fold down the back, chuck the frame on a seat and the wheels in the footwell and you're good)
- a strong, talented manual wheelchair user can perform such feats as going up and down staircases in a decent manual chair; if you’re in power and there’s no lift and no ramp you’re out of luck
- the wheelchair can be manoeuvred, with user in it or not, by others, including up steps
- you can travel in places where there is not likely to be mains power available for recharging
- the average bike shop is likely to be able to help out with minor repairs
- you can actually get around under your own steam
Could go on, but I won’t. Suffice it to say that there are plenty of good reasons to make either choice, and suggesting that in the future every wheelchair user will use power because OMG IT’S OBVIOUSLY BETTER misses the point. And seems somehow to insult those of us who’ve chosen not to embrace power here, now, in the present.
Try doing this in a powerchair:
Now, I can’t do this. Frankly, I don’t think I’d have the guts even to try. All alone, and faced with a staircase like this and a strong need or desire to climb it, I would probably get out of the wheelchair, then crawl or bump up the stairs one by one, pulling my wheelchair behind me, and get back in at the top (difficult, but do-able). There is no way I could do the same thing with a powerchair, it’s just too heavy and is not designed to be lugged around like that. Would I trust a stair climbing powerchair? Not very damn likely. And even if I had one, I wouldn’t use it. I like getting around under my own power, and actually making some use of what muscle power I have left. Power isn’t for me. It’s not for a lot of people, at least not full-time. Some folks have both kinds of wheelchair and use what’s most appropriate for where they have to be on a given day or how they’re feeling.
I’m including some examples below of good-looking, well-performing, lightweight and ultra-lightweight modern manual wheelchairs (mostly marketing pics). I’m personally picturing Admiral Pike in the TiLite, though possibly with flashier back wheels (they're easily interchanged, with the caveat that US and European axle diameters may differ). :-)

(Quickie Q7, aka Quickie Helium. Aluminium, with thicker tubing than would be necessary with more expensive metals. Consequently has a somewhat blunt, rough, 'butch' look to my eye. Lots of folks hate the caster position on these, since they're in-line with the main wheels rather than tucked in a little so they tend to get in the way more.)

(Lasher Sport BT-MG. These guys do some pretty amazing custom work. Check out their dragon chair!)
(Panthera X. Very modern, very very light, lots of carbon fibre, very wow.)

(TiLite ZRA, adjustable, titanium, beautiful. The Aero-Z is the aluminium version, which I was able to trial recently. Sweet chair from a legitimately well-regarded company.)

(Colours Razorblade. This is what I'm getting, though in a profoundly different configuration. If I hadn't been roped into trying one a couple of years ago at a show I would never have considered this model, because the way the chair looks in the stock photos isn't attractive to me, and nor is the company's insistence on 'bling' and on using sexy women--no sexy men in sight--to advertise its chairs. But the proof's in the trial. When I came to do official trials to identify the best new chair for me, no other chair made me grin. It feels right. And I've opted to go without the bling ;-)

(Progeo Joker Evolution. Saw this at a trade show, up there on a pedestal like the minor god it is, and snapped a picture because I knew I didn't dare ask the price! I call it 'The Thing of Beauty'. I love its green trim, particulary the green wheel rims--NOT push rims, they've actually coloured the metal of the wheel! Spectacular.)
I thought I’d finish up with a nice, handy, memorable slogan that perhaps Hollywood types can actually grok: GIVE SEXY ACTORS SEXY WHEELCHAIRS!
Because wheelchairs are not the enemy. Wheelchairs are wonderful. Wheelchairs are how you get out and do awesome things in the world when your feet can’t be trusted to carry you. And getting around by wheelchair can be fun in ways that getting around on foot can't; trust me, I've been there, done both.
A wheelchair can fit like a glove. It can feel like part of you. It can express your personality. It can be beautiful. It can be sexy.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-13 04:45 pm (UTC)I do consider my powerchair as getting me around under my own steam - I don't need to be accompanied, and saying it's less so than a manual when I can't physically use a manual would be a bit offensive if it were an abled person saying that!
I can also travel pretty far & long, within my own definition of such, without needing to charge it - I've only once in the time I've had it so far ended up without any charge left before I get home, 200 metres from my bus stop, and enlisted a friendly policeman to push me in freewheel. I can get roughly 25 miles out of every charge, which is more than enough for me.
Oh, and my local wheelchair/mobility scooter hire place, and there's a branch in most cities in England, are entirely happy to do minor (and sometimes a bit worse than minor) repairs for me for free. I had a part replaced by them free recently.
Last thing: powerchairs can totally be sexy too - mine is a lovely, comfy Invacare Harrier Plus covered in sparkly butterflies, which CAN have all those bells & whistles like tilting, armrests, cosy cushions & kerb climbers added or removed easily - and honestly, the bigger deal here is that we need more chair-user presence and representation and more accurately done, isn't it?
I love your post, I do, but I feel a little bit excluded by your definition of sexy since I can't handle a manual chair. Gonna share this though! Plenty of my circle will be interested. Found this through
no subject
Date: 2012-10-13 10:09 pm (UTC)My bias is of course obvious; the physios and OTs have been hinting for years that I ought to go power, and my immediate reaction is to see the downsides. I have a degenerative condition, and I know that switching to a powerchair will cause more rapid deterioration for me. Others with similar conditions don't find it so, I know, because they're able to be disciplined and use their powerchairs in such a way that their energy each day goes on things more important than getting around and they end up getting more stuff done each day than they otherwise would. Pretty sure that when I do concede the need for power, I'm going to find it a revelation and be busy zooming off discovering all the things I couldn't do before. But right now, I'm enjoying using my arm muscles while I've still got 'em.
I don't disagree that powerchairs can be sexy. I do disagree that lugging 70kg of wheelchair up a flight of stairs is comparable to lugging 7kg of wheelchair up a flight of stairs. And while repairs may be easy for you to arrange, in your home nation, I wonder how well you'd manage if you were playing tourist? An acquaintance had some difficulty finding anywhere that could and would do a minor repair to his powerchair while in Italy, whereas a bike shop is pretty easy to find the world over. Of course, in either case a language barrier is going to be a problem with explaining what you need... I'm not up with the play on how far a modern powerchair can get on a single charge, but I know I'd be concerned about it if travelling in a foreign country or during a zombie apocalypse or something. :-) And I know that when I used a mobility scooter at school in my teens, there were times when I'd arrive in the morning and find that it somehow magically hadn't charged overnight (power cut?), as well as times when it ran out of charge without warning when it should have been fine.
A powerchair is the best--the only--choice for you. I get that. But it's not the best or only choice for everyone, and I don't want to see Hollywood starting to put everyone in power because they think it's the shining pinnacle of mobility. It isn't, any more than a car always beats a horse. In the cases given above, we are, with the possible exception of Pike, talking about people with SCIs or conditions indistinguishable on screen from SCIs, specifically paras. The wheelchair basketball crowd, you could say. The people the vast majority of society seem to think of when you say 'disability'. And they're people with a lot of choices when it comes to wheelchairs--far more than you or I have. (During my trial process this time, reps showed up on three occasions with trial chairs I physically couldn't push. At all. Couldn't reach the wheels. Despite them all having had the same basic specs requested by the OT. One of those reps was simply unable to make her trial chair work for me at all. So I'm not like, say, Bobby Singer, who seems to get around pretty well in his hospital clunker. You can't put me in any old thing and have it work. You CAN put an able-bodied actor in any old thing. Which is why they do. *sigh*)
I didn't mean to exclude powerchair users so much as simply to write what I do know a little something about. I'd be happy to link to a response post if you're interested in writing one.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2012-10-30 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 05:14 am (UTC)I just wish it was easier to convince Hollywood to actually cast actors who use wheelchairs :-/.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 06:46 am (UTC)Thanks for this post and all the details in it. I'm a fan of Oracle (before she got magically healed, dammit!) and this is very useful information for writing her.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 09:04 am (UTC)also, yay dark angel!
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 09:06 am (UTC)I am dismayed to admit this isn't something I have thought about a great deal in the past (additionally because I spent a significant time walking with a cane, and *did* look at trends / functionality of canes only to realise that what House was walking with was especially useless (especially for a doctor) - I see cane issues in a lot of TV shows, so I'm frustrated with myself that I hadn't used my brain or consideration to look at wheelchair issues too), but it's inserted itself into the forefront of my brain now and I'm going to follow up some of those links and have an explore. Thank you again.
You've also made me think about how cinematography *does* often make a big deal of the wheelchair, and I'm going to watch shows that feature characters in wheelchairs more closely now, so I can get in the habit of picking that up.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 09:23 am (UTC)Well, I mean, it's not unheard of.
(I don't mean to dilute your excellent point, just providing your commenters with further sexy things to ogle. The first link especially, it's like a Fast & Furious flick.)
But, more to the point, I definitely agree that using hospital-looking chairs is a huge mistake and missed opportunity for characterisation. (I mean, it could be a conscious choice to emphasise reluctance to do research/meet with professionals - but that could only work in Bobby's case, I think.) And worldbuilding, too, because there are so many cool theories about the future of assistive technology! Great post and lovely pic choices.
... Also, wait, Logan gets cured?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-01 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 09:48 am (UTC)It's also kinda.. amusing to me that one of the few cartoon characters in a wheel chair seems to be more accurately portrayed than high profile/high budget live action shows.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 12:15 pm (UTC)And. Yes. Yes. Walking? Eh, I'd rather do something more interesting. And, hey, you might be able to walk, but I can do wheelies, and there's no way you're beating me on a downhill. Etc.
I am a pretty recent chair user (as of about March) and I'm in the supremely lucky position of having two chairs - one Kueschall Champion, custom made, which is very much huge & comfortable & has supportive seating & Alber E-motion anti-tips so I can use it as recliner. My other chair? I got off eBay, because when my Kueschall arrived I was DELIGHTED... and simultaneously dismayed at how big and heavy it was compared with the RGK sports chair I'd been borrowing for 6 months. So, um, I bought an RGK. ;) Which is a thing of joy and BEAUTY, and if I ever end up in NZ again (... which is not totally implausible) you would be extremely welcome to give it a try ;)
Because, yes, this is the other thing: I am SO FAR from being the only person in my local community with two chairs for two purposes (a friend who is a long-term user with an existing XLT with e-motions, plus a power-chair, is also buying a super lightweight titanium chair for getting around the house in after having tried mine!), so WHY CAN'T WE ALSO have actors shown using different chairs for different purposes?
no subject
Date: 2012-11-01 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 12:26 pm (UTC)Actually, devotees find these unrealistic portrayals very off-putting. You forgot the mother of them all: Gattaca. That chair looks like it was stolen from a hospital. And I don't think even hospital chairs would look that bad in that time period!
Anyway, awesome post, I completely agree with everything else. Sorry for butting in.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-06 10:11 pm (UTC)But Gattaca was a great movie
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-02-22 06:20 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2012-10-31 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 01:30 pm (UTC)FWIW, the people I know well locally who are stuck in wheelchairs (no, wait) are stuck (and I do mean stuck) in the hospital / airport / don't work terribly well models. And yes, that's after PT. It may be a shame and a scandal, but there it is. Neither has the disposable income to privately acquire something that would convey, I dunno, mobility? So at the lower end of the income scale -- not where any of these characters live, but that's another issue -- using one of those clunkers would not be unrealistic.
But really, I was mostly reading because I have been developing a very strong interest in wheelchairs lately due to not being able to stand up worth a damn anymore. I have dysautonomia (well, and back and knee and foot and ankle injuries) and am having trouble getting from the car to the doctor's office with the rollator. Increasingly finding myself using it as a really bad wheelchair.
A wheelchair would actually improve my mobility, a lot, and might let me get more exercise. But they weigh more, and I still would have to get the thing in and out of the car. And I don't know how/where I would carry stuff. And‡ ... argh! Anyway, thanks many. *goes off to think*
(‡ And $$. And if my shoulder can't be fixed, all this is irrelevant anyway. And, and. But still, cool posting.)
Thank you!
Date: 2012-10-31 03:40 pm (UTC)I especially appreciated your observation about wheelchair 'fluency'. It is a lovely image and, I suspect, very apt.
Thank you for sharing.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-01 01:10 am (UTC)I admit to frank envy around manual chair users — nothing like a well-fitted chair noodled around by a well-muscled human.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-01 02:33 am (UTC)I shared a quote and linked to this piece on the Space Crip Tumblr.
Exoskeletons
Date: 2016-02-22 06:25 pm (UTC)Is that so hard to build ?
Re: Exoskeletons
From:a few other references
Date: 2012-11-01 03:44 am (UTC)As to characters on television, there's Davros from Dr. Who
http://dw4n.com/Enemies/Davros.php
Despite all the jokes about their inability to negotiate stairs (so how can they rule the earth?), I believe later versions could levitate. I'm unsure if Davros ever got that upgrade.
The US series "Ironside" starred Raymond Burr as the wheelchair-using Chief of Detectives, Robert T. Ironside. It was popular enough to be parodied too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironside_%28TV_series%29#Parodies
Bell Atlantic (now Verizon) was one of the few employers where several of my co-workers had severe handicaps: blind (seeing eye dog and touch-only computer equipment), Deaf, and one in a "wheelchair" that I've never seen elsewhere. The seat raised up and with a padded bar across the knees, she was almost standing upright on the motorized base, so she was at eye-level for conversation and scooting around.
There are occasional TV blurbs of computer-stabilized ones that balance on 2 wheels and can climb stairs, but I'm yet to see one "in the wild".
no subject
Date: 2012-11-01 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-01 09:57 pm (UTC)More than one of the big Swedish actors/stage personalities started out hosting the public service children's show, and I'm so glad that one of the most charming young women who's a host now is a wheelchair user. (The studio has a ramp, and they don't remove it for her days off.)
no subject
Date: 2012-11-02 10:37 pm (UTC)I noticed how very different the wheelchairs were for the various chair based sports in the Paralympics this summer (I saw bits of fencing, boccia, basketball and athletics). Obviously high level sports equipment is going to to be particularly specialized, and for rather different needs than typical day-to-day use, but I think it's a good highlight of one-size-not-fitting-all. The wheelchair basketball was particularly mesmerising, with amazing flow of play.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-02 10:42 pm (UTC)